Caitlin Whoriskey vs Julia Elbaba Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L L L L
Form
W L W L L L L L L LHead To Head: Whoriskey 1 - 0 Elbaba
They have played 3 sets in total, with Whoriskey winning 2 and Elbaba winning 1. The last match between Whoriskey and Elbaba was at the Surprise, 12-02-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Caitlin Whoriskey getting the victory 7-6(2) 1-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Caitlin Whoriskey | 1 |
| Julia Elbaba | 0 |
Surprise(12-02-2018)
7
6
1
6
6
1
| Whoriskey | Stats | Elbaba |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 268 | Highest Rank | 372 |
| 37 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 1 |
| 57% (203-152) | Career Total W/L | 49% (91-93) |
| $14,356 | Career Prize Money | $610 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 1-6 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Caitlin Whoriskey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shelby Talcott
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Genevieve Lorbergs
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Salma Ewing
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caitlin Whoriskey
Player
Francesca Fusinato
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-7(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 1-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
65%
(
70 of
108)
1st Serve %
75%
(
85 of
113)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
57 of
85)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
115)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
58 of
115)
113
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caitlin Whoriskey
Player
Usue Maitane Arconada
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Julia Elbaba Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Leduc
Player
Julia Elbaba
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lina Glushko
Player
Julia Elbaba
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Julia Elbaba
63%
(
73 of
115)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
45 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
111
|
5-7 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Julia Elbaba
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Julia Elbaba
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Julia Elbaba
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Elbaba
Player
Aleksandra Pitak
49%
(
43 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 7-5 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Halbauer
Player
Julia Elbaba
74%
(
78 of
105)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
112)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Elbaba
Player
Victoria Smirnova
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
48%
(
50 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (203/152) | Win/Loss | 49% (91/93) |
| 57% (457/346) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (209/206) |
| 54% (3888/3371) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1882/1846) |
| 62% (113/68) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (70/68) |
| 55% (67/55) | Clay Win/Loss | 37% (10/17) |
| 47% (22/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (11/8) |
| 20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 141 | Aces Total | 189 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 187 | Total Double Faults | 359 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 593.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 581.36 |
| 64% (2727/4286) | 1st Serve % | 61% (3939/6430) |
| 61% (1676/2727) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (2338/3939) |
| 46% (714/1559) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1097/2491) |
| 43% (196/459) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (343/718) |
| 42% (1781/4264) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2730/6235) |
| 50% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (117/101) | Challenger W/L | 46% (66/76) |
| 65% (82/44) | Futures W/L | 66% (25/13) |
| 58% (202/350) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (90/183) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (39/75) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (15/27) |
| 47% (44/94) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (20/48) |
| 87% (200/174) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (94/78) |
| 13% (200/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (94/16) |
| 19% (155/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (90/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
